Friday, June 8, 2012

Steward News

By Paul Pickett, Assistant Chief Steward

Layoffs – Stewards Respond

Ecology stewards and WFSE staff met last week to review the layoffs of April and May. We had filed a “Demand to Bargain” over the impacts of that layoff and wanted to prepare ourselves for negotiations. We also want to look ahead to further layoffs in June and July based on the final supplemental budget passed by the legislature this spring.

There were several impacts of the layoffs that we were concerned about:
  • How do the layoffs affect workload, both for the employees left in the program where cuts occurred, and for the employees who bumped into new positions?
  • How will staff placed in new positions receive training, mentoring, and other organizational support, so they are successful in their new position?
  • Will staff who have “reasonable accommodations” for disabilities have their accommodations reviewed and updated to reflect new duties and work conditions?
We also identified several areas where we feel management fell short and that could be improved for the next round of layoffs:
  • The union received notice of layoffs at the last minute and had to scramble to provide representation for staff being laid off. Employees were called into meetings on short notice, sometimes only a few hours, to be told they were being laid off, and then had only three days to provide updated and detailed resumes.
  • Management could have provided more information up front about the layoffs, including the reasons for the layoffs. When requests for information were made, response was slow. We’d prefer prompt responses to our requests, rather than the appearance of “foot-dragging”.
  • Negotiations weren’t scheduled until after layoffs and subsequent bumps were done. This defeats the intent of effectively negotiating impacts. Negotiations should be scheduled as soon as possible after the notice of layoffs.
  • Management informed the union that no “Informal Options” would be offered. This is optional under the contract, but this position appears draconian and not helpful to employees being laid off.
  • The union only had a seniority list that was over six months out of date, and did not include Veteran’s time, the layoff units, or part-time/full-time status. Therefore we had no clear idea what seniority criteria management was using for choosing Formal Options.
  • Communication to employees could have been improved, especially about their representation rights, and about their options for finding a job in their old job class after a demotion.
Stewards will be part of on-going negotiations and discussions on these topics. Meanwhile, we are already working on the next round of cuts. If you have any questions – ask a steward!

WFSE/AFSCME Communicators Conference

By Jim Wavada and Dolores Mitchell

This year’s AFSCME/WFSE Communicators conference on April 20-21, 2012 at the SeaTac Hilton came at the conclusion of a brutal legislative session in Washington State. We saw the beginnings of a Wisconsin-style effort to “blame the public worker” for the Great Recession. 
The Tea Party Republicans were after our jobs and they made no secret of it.  We had to scramble and lobby our friends aggressively to preserve our basic rights to organize and to preserve our contract.  Thanks to some “confused” Senate Democrats, lovingly referred to as the “Roadkill Caucus,” it was a very close call. 

This conference was the perfect antidote to the post adjournment depression that had settled like a ground fog on many of us.  It showed weary survivors an effective way to fight back, reframe the issues, expose the villains, and show the public the real heroes that we all are. In short, it was great!

Blaine Rummel, AFSCME Associate Director of Communications, started off the training with a rousing presentation on the recent fight for Wisconsin, which continues with a hotly contested and expensive June recall election against Gov. Scott Walker and his legislative allies.  Blaine demonstrated how everyday union rank and file members can communicate our bigger message about collective bargaining rights more effectively than anyone else.

Here’s a clue—make it personal and understand the basic elements of a good story.  A mid-morning plenary session led by Deb Kidney and Korey Hartwich of AFSCME International taught us just how to do this.  Facilitators led groups in an exercise designed to demonstrate the power of personal stories.  Some were moved to tears by the heart-wrenching stories from the Council 28 members who stood between clients and catastrophe in so many cases. With effective storytelling, we help taxpayers and voters understand how our jobs help them to live better, safer lives.

The second day of the conference allowed participants to focus on one of two topics--working to be more effective public speakers or learning to use social media like Labor Web, Facebook and Twitter more effectively. Korey Hartwich led the training on effective public speaking and WFSE Council 28’s own Laura Reisdorf led hands-on computer lab training in the use of Facebook and Twitter. 

The training closed with a report on values-based communication and training on how to use the new Heroes Handbook v1 from communications consultant Ella Andrews.  This report and the handbook are the culmination of a year of research into how to effectively communicate our progressive values to voters and taxpayers.  Andrews walked us through using the basic elements of good story telling: a hero with tools, a villain with weapons, a threat to be countered and a quest that is noble.

This storytelling approach to communications comes out of hard science.  Cognitive research on the connection between neural activity in the brain and decision-making revealed that our amigdula (that small piece of the brain that generates our fight or flight reactions) generates most of our decision-making and helps us define about what we value most.  We then use our higher brain function in the cerebral cortex to gather and organize the factual data to support the decisions we’ve already made about how we feel about something.

In other words, the facts don’t matter if they don’t jive with the emotional attachment we have to an idea.  Appealing to the cerebral cortex, where we test and process facts, is a waste of time until you have successfully appealed to the amigdula, popularly referred to as our lizard brain. 
Conservative communications guru Frank Luntz, wrote Words That Work, based on this same research.  His handbook of the anti-government rhetoric has been used by antigovernment lobbies for a decade with a lot of success. Luntz learned that facts don’t matter, if you don’t first get people onboard the same emotional, values-driven train as you. Luntz realized that to change a person’s values system, you must first send a convincing message to their amigdula, often referred to as their “lizard brain—not their cerebral cortex. 

That’s the major insight inspiring the Hero’s Handbook we all received as part of this training.  The small handbook is chock full of survey-tested language for expressing values that union workers embody.  It lays out the basic elements of a hero/villain story and suggests how to put your story on the correct side of that line using carefully chosen words. Best of all, this incisive training regimen is going to be available to all union members.  WFSE Council 28 will be sponsoring a “train-the-trainer” session on the Hero’s Handbook in the near future.  Look for locally available versions of this training soon.

They could have named this year’s annual Communicators Conference the “Eye-popping, Totally Awesome, Finally We’re Going To Fight Back, What a Great Way to Tell Your Story” Conference.  But that would violate most of what we learned that weekend in SeaTac. Instead, we’ll just make a note that it was one of the better organized and effective trainings that WFSE Council 28 and AFSCME have ever offered, and that more is coming.

2013-2015 Bargaining Update

The Federation’s General Government Bargaining Team has reached tentative agreement on more than half of the next contract after just three days of bargaining. By doing this, the united and ready Federation bargaining team freed up more time for summer negotiations on more complicated articles, including compensation. Visit WFSE.org > Bargaining > General Government for more information!

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Attend Lunch & Learn on May 22

An information sharing event with members of the Lacey City Council: Mayor Virgil Clarkson, Cynthia Pratt, and Andy Ryder.

What’s on your mind?
  • Martin Way crosswalk?
  • Bike paths?
  • Growth and Development?
 Join us! All are welcome!
Tuesday, May 22
Noon to 1 PM
Ecology HQ Library (3rd Floor)
 Snacks will be provided.

HQ-MEL Communication Committee Starts Work

by Mariann Cook Andrews 

Union members with concerns that are not covered under the contract can now contact members of their local Union Management Communication Committee for assistance. The Headquarters and Manchester Environmental Laboratory (HQ-MEL) committee formed in February and can now help Ecology employees in those offices.

The Washington Federation of State Employees bargained for and won a clause in the contract to establish regional and headquarters communication committees at Ecology. Several other agencies have similar systems.

Our Mission Statement

We are the Union part of your Ecology Headquarters-Manchester Environmental Laboratory Union Management Communications Committee. We are here to collect HQ & MEL employees’ concerns, and bring them to management. We provide a system for giving and receiving ideas on matters that affect your ability to do your job.

The committee will handle concerns such as:
  • Building closures
  • Building Access       
  • Workplace health and safety
  • Loud hand dryers
  • Parking
  • Rodents
  • Pets
The committee will refer concerns that come under the union contract to the bargaining committee, shop stewards, or other groups if appropriate.

The group has already worked on one employee’s concern about paid vs. unpaid parking in the Lacey building’s parking garage.

HQ-MEL Committee members:
  • Barb Anderson, HQ-Water Resources
  • Dustin Bilhimer, HQ-Water Quality
  • Elena Guilfoil, HQ-Air Quality
  • Dolores Mitchell, HQ-Toxics Cleanup (Dolores also serves on the statewide Union Management Communication Committee)
  • Mariann Cook Andrews, HQ-Hazardous Waste & Toxics Reduction
Union members in the two offices elected the committee members for the duration of the contract.

Below are members of the other regional UMCC committees:
  • CRO: Committee is still being formed—Contact a steward if you would like to be a member!
    ERO: Shara-Li Joy, Marcie Mangold, Phil Leinart, and Scott Mallery
    NWRO: Committee is still being formed—Contact a steward if you would like to be a member!
    SWRO: Pat Bailey, Robin Munroe, Tom Middleton, Bob Troyer, and Lydia Wagner.

Survey of Members Shows Support for Ecology Local

By Paul Pickett

Last autumn, a group of Ecology employees petitioned the President of AFSCME to create a new Local for Ecology Bargaining Unit members in Thurston County. The petition is under review and we are still awaiting a decision.

As part of preparing ourselves for self-governance, we wanted to find out more about how employees viewed the Local, if it would increase their involvement, and if they needed more information.

We now have 52 responses to that survey!

Question 1:
Almost two-thirds of employees (65%) told us that if an Ecology agency-based local were created, their level of support and activity would stay the same. Another one-quarter said that it would encourage them to be more active and they’d be more likely to volunteer. Only two employees said that they would be less involved. This is a very positive result – it tells us that we are likely to see more activism, and in any case it can do little harm.
Question 2:
Over half the employees (56%) told us they understood the issues, didn’t care, or didn’t need more information about changing to an Ecology agency-based local. This is also a positive message, because it tells us that our newsletter articles and other information have been reaching staff. However, almost a third of employees want more information. This tells us that we need to continue communicating about the local proposal and its implications.    
We will be working on several ways to respond to the need for more information. The newsletter articles will be posted on the Ecology Bargaining Unit blog and we will work harder to distribute the blog address (http://wfsec28-ecology.blogspot.com/).

We are starting up monthly meetings of the “proto-local” open to all members of WFSE who work in the Lacey building. We will also be exploring other ways to communicate, such as better use of bulletin boards in the building. We welcome your ideas for getting information to our members.

Lastly we were very happy to provide the prize drawing of a $50 gift card to Hannah Aoyagi! Thanks to everyone who responded to the survey. It will help us build a better and stronger employee organization at Ecology.

Stewards News

By Paul Pickett

Layoffs

April was a tough month for stewards. Six employees at HQ and SWRO in the Spills and HWTR programs were laid off. One of them turned down their “formal option” (the job they were offered) and left the agency. The other five took their options. Unfortunately, many of the options represented a demotion and all were jobs held by another employee (i.e. a “bump”). That resulted in another 5 employees laid off and offered options. We are not sure how that all turned out, except it appears that at least 4 landed in vacant positions, although once again taking demotions.

Nobody is happy about layoffs, and many people are frustrated with the seniority system and the use of “bumps” that favor senior employees. However, keep in mind a few things:
  • The system is intended to reward longevity in state service. Without seniority, highly paid senior employees could be the first laid off, as often happens in the private sector. 
  • The system is also intended to discourage favoritism. We don’t want a “family and friends” system where managers can purge employees or prevent them from filling positions just because they don’t “fit in”. Many employees ask why we can’t have a “merit-based” system to decide on who gets laid off. Unfortunately, although it sounds like a nice idea, experience has shown that such a system is commonly abused. 
  • The seniority system is very “mechanical”. The employee laid off is offered a vacant position first (if available), then a position in the same job class with the least seniority (again, if available), and then other options if available. It is supposed to have nothing to do with who is in the position. Although it’s a lousy situation and no one is happy, it isn’t personal.
  • Finally, the layoffs all started with decisions made by management. They made decisions to offer up cuts in certain parts of the agency based on priorities they set. The governor accepted those cuts and the legislature included them in the budget. If layoffs, seniority, and bumps make you angry, I suggest you direct your anger to a Governor and legislature who refuse to consider closing tax loopholes or raising user fees instead of cutting vital programs.
Demands to Bargain
  • In April the agency issued a new parking plan for the HQ/SWRO building. It includes a proposal to tow employees cars if they are caught three times parking in the wrong spot. Employees are unhappy with the plan, and based on the advice of union members, the union has demanded to bargain over this issue. 
  • We have also demanded to bargain over the impact on working conditions from the layoffs described above. We can’t stop a layoff, but we can address issues like training, workload, and reasonable accommodation.
  • Bargaining dates for these DTB’s have not been set at the time of publication. If you have any comments or questions, please contact a UMCC member or steward.